Anastasiia Gureva vs Antonia Schmidt Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Examining the recent performance on the second serve, Schmidt shows a marginal advantage by winning 40.09% of points, compared to Gureva's 35.68%. This statistic is highly relevant to match predictions as it significantly affects the outcome of games. Comparatively, in return games, Gureva surpasses Schmidt by securing 54.46% of points on their opponent's second serves, while Schmidt manages 51.34%. When looking at returning the first serve, Gureva maintains her edge with a 36.19% success rate versus Schmidt's 29.39%.

Under high-pressure scenarios, Schmidt has demonstrated a superior ability to navigate breakpoints, saving 50.18% of them, whereas Gureva has saved 44.75%. This could be a crucial factor for in-game betting predictions. In terms of overall match performance over the past year, Schmidt has a slight edge, achieving a 57.89% win rate (33 wins, 24 losses) as opposed to Gureva's 53.57% (30 wins, 26 losses). Such performance indicators offer a comprehensive view of who might be favored in their forthcoming encounter.

When evaluating their preferred surfaces, Gureva's performance peaks on Hard courts with a 66% win rate (64 wins, 33 losses), whereas her success on Clay surfaces drops to 56% (28 wins, 22 losses). Schmidt performs best on Hard with a 59% win rate (41 wins, 28 losses) but struggles on Indoor Hard, holding a 47% win rate (9 wins, 10 losses). These statistics suggest surface preference could be an influential factor in their matchup.

The direct head-to-head encounters reflect a slight edge for Gureva, who has won their sole meeting. On that occasion, Gureva triumphed 6-4, 6-1 at the W 15 Casablanca on Clay in July 2022. Historically, matches between these two have lasted an average of 1 hour and 31 minutes. Furthermore, neither player has demonstrated a superior performance in deciding sets or tiebreaks in their direct matchups, adding an element of unpredictability if the current match extends to those points.

Analyzing opponent quality, Gureva has faced players with an average rank of 398.14 over the past year, while Schmidt’s opponents have had an average rank of 420.18. Experience against higher-ranked opponents could be a determining factor in enhancing player performance. Interestingly, Schmidt boasts a higher win rate in deciding sets, prevailing 74% of the time compared to Gureva’s 56% over the last twelve months. This capability could be significant if the match reaches a crucial point.

Lastly, both players' recent conversion rates of breakpoint opportunities reveal Schmidt has a minimal lead at 41.18% conversion, while Gureva is close behind with a 40.69% rate. Given these comprehensive performance metrics, Schmidt seems more likely to secure victory in this upcoming match. Nevertheless, Gureva's past head-to-head win and adaptability on Hard surfaces may influence the final result.